![]() While the filmmakers were in the park legally (they purchased tickets), they were in direct violation of the express and inferred guest user agreement that comes with entry. These guests all have probable legal ground to sue the filmmakers for both damages and residual compensation.ĭisney has various and sundry legal tools at their disposal for pursuing Mr. Many park guests, who likely assumed that they might appear in the background of someone's family photos, may have been captured in this decidedly commercial production. ![]() You cannot take a person's image or voice without their express release. But the truth is that the filmmakers trampled brazenly across many legal and ethical lines to make this production possible. There is a bit of an "underdog" factor with the filmmaker, who has never been commercially successful in his work. I work in the industry in IP development and am very curious to see how it all shakes out. He said that Disney has certainly been formulating an onslaught of litigation even as they try to limit the inadvertent promotion of the film by publicizing their displeasure. Based upon the nature of the content, the audience should be very limited. ![]() He said Disney will likely let them have their limited release without intervention. I've spoken with senior motion picture counsel from another major studio on this over the past few days. There was an extensive thread on this about six months ago. Re: Escape from Tomorrowland - Illegal movie?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |